The Cowtown Chronicles

Tonight’s Neighborhood Candidates Forum

Today’s forum put together by the University area neighborhoods, a loose coalition of neighborhoods surrounding TCU, but all within District 9.

Wendy Davis came out to briefly address the crowd, explaining how she sympathizes with the candidates and how nervous they are. Her words were heartfelt and as usual, she nearly teared up when she got a standing ovation. Once again she demonstrates that she’s a real person and not just a stuffed suit.

Our moderator today was Jim Douglas from Channel 8. He took the time to mention Tony Spangler and Bud Kennedy from the S-T, but no love for the CowtownChronicles. :(

I had planned on summarizing the whole meeting, even going so far to make notes on the whole thing, each candidates answer to every question, and their opening and closing statements. But damn, that’s a lot of work, so instead I’ll give you my impressions of how things went. If you wanted ACTUAL FACTS, you should have been at the forum.

I think all of the candidates were pretty polished. Jim Beckman still has some rough edges, and Chris Turner still acts like he’s had too many Dr. Peppers. Juan Rangel honestly seemed a bit pissed about having to be there. I mean, he definitely tried, and answered questions honestly, but he just really seemed to be frustrated that he wasn’t already on the council. In fact, at the end of the evening, he used his 2 minute conclusion to essentially say that we needed to just get over it and pick a candidate now. I think it was really an impassioned cry for the district to come to a consensus and find the best candidate for the job, but it kind of came across as admonishing the district for considering any candidate besides him.

Joel Burns is obviously well informed, and he seemed very prepared for this event. But HE’S SUCH A POLICY WONK! Every answer sounded exactly like something that some political operative would say. The candidates were asked about whether they’d support additional council members, and Joel responded that he wouldn’t be able to say whether he supported that idea or not until he’d seen the proposal on how the districts would be redrawn. He’s not even in office yet, and he’s looking to gerrymander the districts! When asked about how to cut city expenditures and therefore property taxes, he started talking about actuarial accounts. He bragged about how he had studied several capital improvement projects before this forum, so he could answer questions about transit proposals. It just came off as SUPER, SUPER wonky. (He also used the most interesting word of the forum: “centrifugal.”) I didn’t like his answer about infill development, he seemed to be advocating the overly restrictive standards some neighborhoods have, such as Fairmount. He also worked REALLY HARD to hitch his wagon to Wendy’s record. My honest feeling is that electing Joel would be anti-progressive. All of his answers emphasized how much he would maintain the staus-quo, and that’s not good enough for me. Even his closing statement didn’t say anything about what he’d do NEW, but instead that he wanted to be a good steward for District 9. No boldness, no vision, just being a good steward.

ONE candidate seemed honest and real, and that’s Bernie Scheffler. He didn’t come across as wonky, he obviously cares a lot about this city, and he wants the best for Fort Worth. He doesn’t pretend to have all the answers, but he’ll do the work to find out, and I believe that he is the best candidate for District 9.

By the way: If the smoking ban is important to you, only ONE candidate supported a complete ban – Bernie Scheffler. All the other candidates waffled on the issue except for Jim Beckman, who said “No” when asked if he supported a further ban. Joel said he wasn’t willing to take up the ban now, which to me meant that he’s not going to support doing anything more about it.

It was an interesting experience to say the least. I don’t look forward to doing it again, but I will if I have to, y’all deserve it, although you totally need to go to the next one yourself. BTW, I took pictures, but the flash on my camera isn’t powerful enough to make them worthwhile. I don’t think the S-T got any pics either.

Category: fort worth

Tagged: , , , , ,

7 Responses

  1. Kevin says:

    Wish I could have been there – wasn’t able to make it. Thanks for the summary, Pete (though I have to admit I’m a fan of Fairmount’s tough guidelines – it’s too significant and remarkable a neighborhood to not protect zealously).

  2. Pete says:

    I agree to an extent. I think the stringent restrictions have priced out a lot of people who would otherwise buy in Fairmount because they can’t afford to renovate within the guidelines. It’s also a bit backwards to specifically outlaw energy efficient upgrades like double pane windows in the name of historical accuracy. Nonetheless, I do support Fairmount’s restrictions for Fairmount. I’m just worried that these same kind of restrictions will be applied to neighborhoods like Sunset Heights or Ryan Place, which don’t have the kind of cohesiveness that Fairmount does, and would be great locations for Austin-style modern development.

  3. Steve-O says:

    Excellent job, Pete. Thanks for covering this so thoroughly.

  4. Kevin says:

    I almost wish there were tougher standards in Ryan Place and similar neighborhoods, perhaps not quite to Fairmount’s degree but similar. I just worry – I’d like to see funky, cool, modern development, but I’m paranoid that they’d just level everything and replace them with McMansions like in Monticello and other near west side neighborhoods (thank goodness for Village Homes – at least they’ve got taste and talent. I wish all the new stuff on the near west side was as good as their stuff).

  5. Pete says:

    What I’d really rather see is square footage and height limits. I think that would go farther to limit the crap that’s going up in Monticello, etc. than historic overlays. I honestly don’t mind new construction, as long as it’s scaled reasonably to the homes around it and not hideous like so much of what passes for “new construction” these days.

  6. Mondalejones says:

    So you are critical of Joel Burns because he sounded like he knew what he was talking about?

    And you are critical of Juan Rangel because he asked folks to make a choice and vote for him because he is the only one who has been effective in elective office?

    These observations just make your otherwise good observations of Bernie Scheffler not seem credible. Don’t detract what Bernie has to offer by feeling you have to criticize the other candidates. Give a fair review of all the candidates and indicate that you like Bernie because he opposes a ban on drilling. You would come off more credible doing that.

    Just my observations of your observations.

  7. Suzette says:

    Thank you Pete for sharing your take on the forum tonight. I wanted to go but was unable to attend. I appreciate you taking the time to inform us and I trust your judgement and I bet had I been there that I would agree with you 100%! Great Job. I hate to see Wendy Davis leave Fort Worth and I hope Bernie Scheffler wins. I too think he is very sincere in his care of our beautiful City and I think he has the brain power, balls and guts to stand up for what is good for the City and it’s Citizens.

History

google

couk