Archive for the ‘politics’ Category

Clueless Fear-mongering

Friday, October 3rd, 2008

I should know better than to read the letters to the editor in the Star-Telegram. It’s like the editors pick the MOST loony letters sent in each week in order to illustrate just how crazy both sides can be.

Take this one for example:

Scares liberals

Gov. Sarah Palin is a Christian. She is a strong supporter of her family. She is a moral person. She thinks killing babies is a poor form of birth control.

She thinks government should be of the people. She thinks Washington politics should be free from graft. She thinks we should be free from being held hostage by foreign oil-producing countries. She thinks terrorists should be dealt with harshly. She thinks the people of this country should elect the president, not Hollywood or the media.

Palin is everything liberals hate.

— Joe Cole, Weatherford

What an insanely ridiculous and simplistic string of assertions and implications that because Palin is supposedly “for” these things that so-called “liberals” are against them.

Barack Obama is a Christian, so is Joe Biden. Both men are strong supporters of their families (Biden was a single dad for a while, does that make him better than Palin?). Barack Obama and Joe Biden are presumably moral persons. I have no evidence (and I’m certain Mr. Cole doesn’t either) that they’re not. Both have made mistakes in the past, but that doesn’t make you immoral, just flawed. Barack Obama and Joe Biden think killing babies is a horrible form of birth control. In fact, it can’t even be classified as a form of birth control, because killing babies after they’re born isn’t exactly “birth control.”

Obama/Biden think government should be of the people, but I’m guessing those people are different people than Mr. Cole wants. Obama/Biden think Washington politics should be free from graft — who’s ever come out in favor of graft? Obama/Biden think we should be free from not only being held hostage by foreign oil producing countries, but also by domestic oil producers. Why can’t otherwise smart people grasp the concept of MOVING THE FUCK OFF OF OIL?!? (sorry mom) Obama/Biden think that terrorists should be dealt with harshly — Obama supports pursuing them across the border into Pakistan when there’s actionable intelligence, a position that McCain rejects and calls “naive.” (Side topic: When you’re a warmonger, every problem looks like the only solution is war. Terrorism is a CRIMINAL ACT, carried out by non-state actors. Our military is not equipped or trained to fight terrorism, nor are they the appropriate people to be doing it legally or from a policy standpoint. The FBI/CIA should be doing their JOBS and working with our allies in the region to flush out the terrorists, and THEN maybe we could look at military strikes.) Obama/Biden think that the people of this country should elect the president, not Hollywood or the media — the last time I checked, “Hollywood and the media” have WAY fewer votes than “the people of this country.”

I do agree on one point though — Palin is everything liberals hate. She’s a poseur, a small-town mayor (or a small-state governor) who stumbled into the governorship and now presumes that she can hold the second highest office in the land because she “didn’t blink” when she was asked. I’m sorry, but I expect more of the people who run for the highest offices in our democracy. Obama may be lacking experience, but he certainly isn’t lacking intellect or education, two areas that so far Gov. Palin has demonstrated are not her strong suit. She also apparently can’t see past religious dogma when framing her policies, and that’s simply unacceptable.

Everyone who tells you that this is the most important election in history is exactly right. Never before has our country faced such a defining and definite choice: Do we want to continue on our path of glorifying willful ignorance and irrational stubbornness, or do we want to expect more from our leaders and demand that they apply intellect and reason to problems instead of dogmatic homilies and simplistic answers?

The choice is ours — I hope we get it right.

Deliberate Rudeness

Wednesday, September 24th, 2008

I should really call it Deliberate Assholishness, but my mom asked me to clean up my language on the blog, so I’ll just stick to rudeness for now.

This weekend we were driving back from Costco in our truck, which happens to have an Obama sticker in the back window.

While we were stopped at a light, an SUV pulls up next to us and honks their horn. I look over and see someone holding up this t-shirt.

I don’t even know what to say about this. What kind of person does something like that?

New Heights of Absurdity in Politics

Wednesday, September 10th, 2008

You might have heard all of the gnashing of teeth by the McCain-Palin campaign over Obama’s use of a tired old metaphor.

Disregarding for a second that Republicans are the ones who YEARS ago decried the modern taste for “political correctness” and all of the immediate cries of offense that poorly chosen words would garner, I posit this question:

Which is more offensive?

Saying that the McCain-Palin campaign is more of the same and that you can put all the lipstick you want on a pig (or a pitbull?), and it’s still a pig.

OR

Ridiculing someone for making a deliberate choice to take a low-paying, extremely difficult job as a community organizer instead of the much more lucrative fast track that Obama could have taken to Federal Court clerkship or a six-figure salary at a BigLaw firm? (I have no illusions that Obama made his choice for purely altruistic reasons, just like McCain hasn’t stayed in public office for 30 years because he’s so in love with his country.)

Is using a tired old homily of the “lipstick on a pig” sort automatically sexist because the opposing campaign happens to have a woman on the ticket? Isn’t it just as sexist to ASSUME that she’d choose to wear lipstick and would automatically self-identify with a crack made in regards to lipstick?

Why are you a Republican?

Monday, August 25th, 2008

Because apparently I can’t get enough of politics (despite the fact that I’m SICK to death of all the back and forth bullshit), the above is my genuine question.

If you’re not a Republican, but you’re still a “conservative,” please comment. I’m genuinely curious. Assuming I get a couple of responses, I’ll follow-up with a post on why I’m a “liberal.”

This is a serious question. Give it some thought. Don’t post answers like “Because Democrats want to take our guns!!!” That’s not a reason for being a conservative/Republican. That’s a reason (to you) for NOT being a Democrat.

KTHAKSBAI

Chris Cole Drops Some Knowledge

Friday, August 8th, 2008

This is the first of hopefully many guest posts by my friends and acquaintances — basically anyone who wants to submit something, if I like it, I’ll post it! — Pete

One Step Forward, Two Hundred and Thirty Two Years Back…

Has anyone noticed the gradual degeneration of civility that’s taken place over the past decade? I took a sociology course a couple of years ago in which we discussed the ramifications of post-industrialization. This is the first time in human history that a country has moved passed being agricultural or industrial based. I think that this shift in paradigms paired with the massive technological growth in the past fifty years has created a state of upheaval. People are always running to catch up. In addition, the emergence of personal cell phones equipped with more technology than the first vessels in space, text messaging, and ipods have created a schism in personal, intimate connections. There was a study conducted in Japan in 2006 that showed how language was actually breaking down into a rudimentary form more closely related to hieroglyphics than to a contemporary language. The students involved in the study also showed signs of an inability to recognize emotions in real time — meaning that they could tell if someone was happy or sad when using emoticons, but were completely at a loss when confronted with a live human being.

As I began thinking about this further, I realized its a combination of far more factors than simply technology and the type of economic structure into which the U.S. has evolved. We have such limitless options when it comes to information gathering. We can read twenty different newspapers, watch any number of local, national, and international news programs, and search any website in the world from our couches with the click of a button. Furthermore, we inundate ourselves with fabulous and over-glamorized celebrities who are a minute portion of the population, yet every 13 year old kid thinks that he has to be rich in order to be someone. “Cribs” has effectively created a socially acceptable pop-culture form of keeping up with the Jones’. When money becomes God who do people turn to when there is none? Self-perpetuating cycles of overspending, going into debt, and living lives far beyond financial means becomes the norm, and whole subsections of the population grow up on welfare and in poverty — and they accept it. There are women in this country unable to care for children they already have, and continue to get pregnant because they know the government will give them more money if they do. Those kids then grow up in an environment where it is reinforced, maybe not by words, but definitely by actions that it’s ok not to work. Just have more kids and at least you’ll be at this level of poverty that’s familiar. All the while there’s MTV saying here’s what living is — driving a Bentley and living on the beach in Miami. Things that most people will never achieve. So I ask, what makes that possible?

The government. I’ve placed a lot of blame on pop-culture, but our government is just as much to blame — perhaps more so. Politicians have essentially become actors, and have access to the same wealth as those celebrities featured on “Cribs.” The difference is that rather than setting an example for how to not just survive but thrive through their actions in office, they are teaching people how to exploit every resource until there are none. The U.S. national deficit as of right now is almost $9.5 trillion. What I want to know is if we have been the wealthiest most powerful nation in the world at least since WWII if not longer, why would we let our deficit get so high? Is our government setting an example for responsible financial planning? No. They are showing people that you can borrow as much as you possibly can and just let someone else worry about it because when the time comes to bite the bullet you won’t be around — either because you’re no longer in office or you’re dead. There’s a significant lack of personal responsibility. My sister has used an analogy any time I’ve really wanted to help or possibly over-extend myself because she knows I have a tendency toward this — I’ve had trouble saying no to people in the past. She says, “When you’re on an airplane what does the flight attendant say to do in case of an emergency? She says that oxygen masks will deploy and that YOU need to put yours on before you can help anyone else. YOU can’t help anyone else if you can’t breathe or are dead.” That’s how I feel about our country right now. How are we going to help third world countries if we can’t handle our own economic problems here?

Well, we’ve put ourselves in the precarious position of policing the entire world, taking out loans from almost anyone who wants to be a lender, and we already have or are outsourcing anything tangible economically that we can sell. This is where our post-industrialization comes into play. We have a predominantly service economy meaning that we don’t make many goods any more. So, what would we do were we suddenly at war with China? My point is that we need to step back from our over-extension and reign in our global policing. Part of the reason why we were able to thrive after the Great Depression in the 30s is that we made our own goods. There were American jobs to be had and WWII solidified that. We also practiced this little thing called isolationism. Perhaps we as a nation should try to increase our GDP by making and buying our own goods rather than importing them from China, Japan, Taiwan, and India. At the same time place those things we can sell in other countries just as they have here. Such as Toyota building plants in the U.S. and selling enough of their cars here to become the top auto manufacturer. That should feel like the Cowboys getting beaten on their home turf — our home team is losing. Instead we welcome it — globalization! I do believe that globalization will be good for everyone eventually, but I think we’ve too readily and quickly sent all of our safety net away from our borders. So, if we can reclaim the notion that American made products are good, and become self-sufficient, meaning we stop taking out loans for trillions of dollars, we could start to improve the quality of life here. As that takes place, a portion of our GDP could be devoted to providing foreign aid for countries truly in poverty — not for political ideologies close to no one’s values except those of the politicians profiting from them. We then begin the long arduous task of repaying nearly $10 trillion in debt, but at least we could support ourselves by buying and selling goods in our own country. That would also help with the afore mentioned welfare problems because having industry in the U.S. would create new jobs. Also, we might be able to show the younger generations by example that appearances aren’t everything. Sometimes you have to live in reality and not where you wish you were. I yearn for a public official who’s bold and respectable enough to be a role model. I look back throughout our nation’s history and wonder what it must have been like to live when George Washington and our forefathers were founding this country. What it would feel like to have someone in a position to change things who you can actually look up to. Someone not controlled by partisan politics, but by his or her own principles. A true desire to make things better. I know this is me being idealistic, but I want to think that the world is still capable of change — otherwise what’s the point?

Back to my original thought, we have so many options I don’t think a lot of people know what to choose. I recently read a statistic, which I don’t know how they gathered their data, but it said that 16% of Americans said they were “Non-Religious.” Just from my personal experience I’ve spoken to more atheistic and agnostic people in the past few years than any other time in my life. The basis of religion isn’t my point, but that we don’t have guidance from our government, we don’t have guidance from religion, our schools are underfunded, and parents are too busy trying to keep up. So what do the new generations of kids have to look forward to? It looks like they have depression, ADD and ADHD, anxiety and a myriad of other medications to help them cope with the constant state of flux. That is if they don’t turn to illegal drugs and self-medicate. A life without meaning is quite an empty one. Money, cars, houses, and fame look great until you suddenly realize that you don’t know who you are or what you stand for. I think it all goes back to personal responsibility and stepping up to make a difference in people’s lives. The degeneration of civility I spoke of ranges from people flipping one another off — I was shot the bird by a 70 year old woman last week — to things as simple as not having the time or inclination to acknowledge another person on the street, or hold a door for a stranger. Try having a conversation in which you make eye contact with the other person 90% of the time. Most people I’ve spoken to in recent times avoid eye contact at all costs. Our public fronts are so frail that we fear anyone looking into our eyes and seeing past the facade. No wonder people have so many problems when they feel isolated all the time. That lack of interconnectedness makes it easy to be mean to someone else because they don’t matter. If you figure you don’t know them or have to deal with them to get what you want — your paycheck, car, house, clothes, etc. — why deal with them? Why bother going out your way to be nice? Well, just like Randal in Clerks II I’m taking it back, not his racial slur, but being nice to people. Hopefully it’ll catch on.

Anyway, it’s definitely a strange time in the world, and I think that either we as a nation will evolve and grow to create a new paradigm encompassing post-industrialization in a changing global economy, or we’ll revert back to industrialization because it’s familiar and something we can have a handle on. Either way I feel a major world change is coming and I hope someone comes along to help lead us through it.

On Obama/Clinton vs. McCain

Monday, June 16th, 2008

This wisdom came to me third-hand through Jenna and one of her co-workers…

If you go to a restaurant and order Coke, they often offer Pepsi as an alternative. No one I know replies that they would rather have Draino. If you can’t have the dark fizzy soda of your choice, you go with the next best thing, not he poison you found under the sink.

An Open Letter To John Cornyn

Wednesday, June 11th, 2008

Sent today via his webform:

I’m extremely disappointed that you did not heed the will of your constituents in supporting the Climate Security Act (S. 3036) this week. Poll after poll has shown that the desire for action on climate change crosses party, locality, income, religious, and race boundaries, but somehow it still gets slammed for being some kind of “extremist environmentalist” position.

And this week when you had the chance to stand up to the partisans in your party who are creating fear, uncertainty, and doubt, you chose to stick your head in the sand instead of standing up for what’s right.

This is even more disappointing and exasperating because you claim to be an outdoorsman and to love the natural environment of Texas. I’ve read your articles in various newspapers and outdoors groups’ newsletters. I can tell that you truly love the diverse and rich natural environment we enjoy in Texas, so why won’t you work to protect it?

Your stated reasons, jobs and gas prices, aren’t good enough. I’ll remind you that in the words of WWII veteran and staunch environmentalist David Brower - “There is no business to be done on a dead planet.” If we continue to destroy the world we live in, it won’t matter how many jobs there are in Texas, because no one will want to live here.

As for gas prices — I’d really appreciate it if you and your fellow Senators would provide some context when speaking about opening up the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge. Here are a couple of points that are NEVER addressed when this is mentioned by either side (I’m afraid they don’t look good for your stated position):

1. Drilling in ANWAR (or off the continental shelf) would not produce oil or refined gasoline soon enough to do anything to affect the current price of oil, yet whenever high gas prices are mentioned, ANWAR (in the form of increased domestic oil production) is given as the solution.

2. There is only enough oil in ANWAR to supply 7 months (maybe 13 if you go by the most hopeful estimates) of the daily oil consumption in the US. Do you really think such a small amount of oil will have any affect on the price of fuel? (I know your answer to that is “NO,” but you could never say that publicly.)

Please, give the dogma a rest and start working with the Democratic party to find REAL, LONG-TERM solutions to our energy needs. Climbing up on the backs of your struggling constituents to make a speech about how “I’d love to help, but the Democrats won’t let me” is not the job you were elected to do.

Thank you for your time, I sincerely hope you actually read this message.

Pete Wann
Fort Worth

“Democrats for McCain”

Sunday, June 8th, 2008

Okay, so I feel compelled to write something about this, sort of to get my opinions out there and to hopefully spark some discussion or at least some deep reflection on the part of folks who might be considering this course of action because Hillary wasn’t nominated.

Don’t fucking do it.

By declaring that because Hillary didn’t win the nomination you “are thinking about voting for McCain” or “are definitely voting for McCain” or “Obama is starting from scratch with me,” what you’re really saying is “I never gave a shit about what Hillary stood for, or my fellow Democrats, I just wanted Hillary to win the nomination, so to punish the rest of you, I’ll demonstrate my pettiness by talking shit about the Democratic nominee.”

Here’s the thing: Hillary and Bill get it. They don’t like it. I GUARAN-FUCKING-TEE they don’t like it. But they know that if they raise a major shitstorm and don’t fall in line, they’re DONE as party power-brokers. If the kind of shit that Hillary supporters are talking about stirring up happens, Obama loses the general election, and there’s even a HINT that Bill or Hillary or anyone in their organization is encouraging it, the party will crucify them. They won’t be able to get jobs as junior staffers to the lone State Democratic Congressman in South Dakota (or something equally lowly).

Sure, they could just go off in their dotage and retire somewhere that they can happily diddle the maid and pool boy, leaving a demolished Democratic Party in their wake, but that’s not how they work. They’re patriots through and through, and they’ve devoted their lives to the United States and the Democratic Party. They enjoy unprecedented influence and major power broker status, and i guarantee they’re not going to give that up easily.

More than that, and more importantly, is that Bill and Hillary really do care about the United States and all the things they’ve devoted their lives to working for. I can guarantee that no matter how disappointed they are that they lost the nomination, they would be absolutely gutted if Hillary supporters defecting to the other side (or not turning out for Obama) caused him to lose the general election, not to mention the affect it would have on down-ticket races.

Barack Obama is not Hillary Clinton, but he’s a hell of a lot closer than John McCain could ever be.

Please, take the time to be angry and disappointed. Get it out of your system, vent to your friends, do whatever you feel like you need to do. But when the time comes, show Hillary and Bill that you really do support them by putting your effort behind the party and the issues that they’ve devoted their adult lives to.

State Democratic Convention

Friday, June 6th, 2008

This is a beat down. It’s running much more smoothly than the SD 10, but it is running long, and I haven’t eaten since 1:30.

Playing by the rules kinda screws you over, because you’re supposed to stay and participate for everything, which means you don’t get a chance to eat or rest, really.

People who leave the convention could have their delegate status revoked and an alternate elevated in their place, but they’re not being that strict. I’m just a habitual rules follower.

Attention Democratic National Delegate Candidates:

Wednesday, June 4th, 2008

If you robo-call me at 8AM, I’m going to listen long enough to get your name, then I’m going to campaign AGAINST YOU at the convention.

Seriously… How much money are y’all spending on this campaign? You could better serve your candidate by giving them some of that money.